7 MIN READ

Not every firm that trades or lends money in ADGM is a bank. Market makers and lenders sit in a regulated middle ground, operating under financial services rules without taking public deposits. This is where the right ADGM License becomes decisive. Choosing the wrong category can stall approval, increase capital requirements, or trigger regulatory scrutiny. Understanding how ADGM treats liquidity providers and credit firms saves time, money, and regulatory pain.
Pause before filing any financial services application in ADGM. Market making and lending look simple on the surface, but regulators treat both as serious financial activities with real market risk. These are not commercial trading licences. They fall under FSRA supervision, which means capital rules, governance tests, and ongoing reporting come with the territory.
The right ADGM License determines whether a firm can quote prices, extend credit, or run a lending platform legally. Getting this wrong often leads to delays, rejected submissions, or an expensive restart. Understanding how ADGM draws the line between banking, trading, and lending gives founders and financial institutions a sharper edge before engaging the regulator.
Market making and lending are two of the most misunderstood activities inside ADGM.
Market making refers to firms that provide liquidity to financial markets by continuously quoting buy and sell prices for securities, derivatives, or other financial instruments. These firms do not act as brokers. They trade on their own account to keep markets moving.
Lending refers to extending credit to companies, funds, or institutions without taking deposits from the public. This can include corporate loans, structured credit, trade finance, or fintech based lending models.
Both activities fall under financial services regulation. That means an ADGM License is required before operations begin. These are not banking services, but they are treated with similar seriousness because they create financial exposure in the market.
Yes. Any firm that conducts market making or lending inside ADGM must hold an FSRA approved ADGM License.
These activities cannot be conducted under a commercial or professional licence. They involve balance sheet risk, counterparty exposure, and financial system impact. FSRA oversight is mandatory.
The license is granted based on specific financial activities. A market making firm receives authorisation to deal in investments as principal. A lender receives authorisation to provide credit.
This distinction matters. A firm approved for lending cannot trade securities unless that activity is added to the ADGM License. The regulator ties every permission to a defined risk profile.
Market Maker License
A market maker operates by buying and selling financial instruments on its own account. The goal is to provide liquidity, not to serve retail clients.
Under this ADGM License, firms are permitted to trade equities, bonds, funds, or derivatives as principal. FSRA looks closely at capital adequacy, trading systems, and exposure limits. Market makers must demonstrate the ability to absorb trading losses without harming market stability.
Risk management frameworks are mandatory. Pricing models, position limits, and stress testing form part of the approval review.
Lending License
A lending ADGM License allows a firm to extend credit to companies, investment funds, or institutions.
This does not permit deposit taking. Funds must come from shareholders, investors, or wholesale funding sources. The regulator focuses on credit risk, loan book quality, and governance.
FSRA expects detailed policies on borrower assessment, collateral, default handling, and provisioning. Capital must be sufficient to absorb credit losses.
Fintech Driven Lending Models
Digital lending platforms also fall under the ADGM License regime.
These firms use technology to assess borrowers, price risk, and distribute loans. FSRA reviews algorithms, data sources, and decision rules as part of the authorisation.
Automated underwriting does not reduce regulatory scrutiny. In many cases, it increases it. Model governance, bias controls, and data protection all form part of the approval process.
FSRA does not approve firms based on ideas. It approves institutions.
Every ADGM License applicant must meet minimum capital thresholds that reflect the risk of the activity. Market makers generally face higher capital demands due to trading volatility. Lenders face requirements tied to loan exposure.
Senior management must demonstrate financial services experience. Governance structures must include independent oversight, risk committees, and compliance leadership.
Anti-money laundering controls, client due diligence, and transaction monitoring are required even when dealing only with corporate clients.
Ongoing reporting is part of life under an ADGM License. Financial statements, capital adequacy reports, and risk disclosures are submitted regularly.
The FSRA process follows a clear sequence.
First comes a pre application discussion. This allows the regulator to understand the business model before documents are filed.
Next is the formal submission, including business plans, financial projections, risk frameworks, and governance documents.
FSRA then issues clarification questions. These often require technical responses about trading systems, credit models, or funding sources.
Once satisfied, FSRA grants approval or conditional approval.
The typical timeline for a market maker or lender ADGM License is three to six months.
Banks accept deposits and provide loans to the public. That brings the highest regulatory burden.
Market makers trade financial instruments on their own balance sheet. They do not take deposits or lend to consumers.
Lenders extend credit but fund it through equity, wholesale markets, or private investors.
Each activity has a different capital profile, client base, and risk exposure. This is why ADGM separates them into different ADGM License categories.
Misclassification leads to either overregulation or rejection.
Many firms apply under the wrong activity category. A trading firm often files as a broker when it actually trades on its own account.
Credit businesses underestimate how much capital FSRA expects. Thinly funded lenders rarely pass.
Risk models are often vague. FSRA expects clear, documented, and tested frameworks.
Compliance is treated as an afterthought. Under an ADGM License, it becomes part of daily operations.
Arnifi works with financial firms that need clarity before committing capital.
Every engagement starts with an activity and eligibility assessment. This determines which ADGM License category fits the business model.
Arnifi maps each activity to FSRA permissions, avoiding misclassification.
The team coordinates with regulators during pre-application discussions and submission phases.
Compliance readiness, governance design, and capital planning are built into the process so that approvals are not delayed by preventable gaps.
Is market making allowed in ADGM?
Yes, with an FSRA approved ADGM License.
Can lenders operate without a banking license?
Yes, lending is permitted under a non bank ADGM License.
Do fintech lending platforms need an ADGM license?
Yes, digital lending requires FSRA authorisation.
How long does approval take?
Most applications take three to six months.
Can a license be upgraded later?
Yes, activities can be added through FSRA approval.
Market making and lending in ADGM sit in a regulated space that rewards preparation and penalises shortcuts. These are not side activities under a trading licence. Each requires a carefully structured ADGM License aligned with risk, capital, and governance expectations. Firms that understand this early avoid wasted months and rejected filings. With the right advisory support, ADGM offers a clear, credible path for financial firms that want to operate in global markets from Abu Dhabi. Arnifi helps make that path navigable, compliant, and commercially viable.
Top UAE Packages

Top UAE Packages